Electrochemical Study of Doped Uranium Oxide (UO2) in Slightly Alkaline Sodium Carbonate/Bicarbonate Solutions

Figure 1. CVs recorded on a Dy-UO2 electrode in Ar-purged 0.1 M NaCl containing various concentrations of carbonate.
Figure 1. CVs recorded on a Dy-UO2 electrode in Ar-purged 0.1 M NaCl containing various concentrations of carbonate.

This recent research project was designed to investigate the influence of carbonate/bicarbonate, the key groundwater constituents likely to influence fuel dissolution inside a failed nuclear waste disposal container, on the reactivity of different uranium oxide (UO2) specimens.
A cyclic voltammetric (CV) study of doped UO2 (Dy-UO2, Gd-UO2, 1.5 at% SIMFUEL and UO2.002) in 0.1 M NaCl with and without carbonate/bicarbonate shows the anodic current for the four UO2 electrodes is increased in the potential range -1.2 V to -0.4 V by adding carbonate/bicarbonate. The oxidation is enhanced without any detectable fuel dissolution, confirming that it is anodic oxidation of the UO2 matrix that is being enhanced.
Figure 2. Relative fractions of all three U oxidation states  as a function of applied potential measured on a Dy-UO2 electrode after 1 h of oxidation in 0.1 M NaCl containing 0.05 M carbonate.
Figure 2. Relative fractions of all three U oxidation states as a function of applied potential measured on a Dy-UO2 electrode after 1 h of oxidation in 0.1 M NaCl containing 0.05 M carbonate.

To investigate this surface oxidation mechanism, an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic analysis of the electrochemically oxidized surface was conducted. The U 4f7/2 peak and its deconvolution into contributions from U(IV), U(V) and U(VI) is shown in Figure 3, and the change in composition with applied potential in Figure 2. Between -0.9 V and -0.4 V there is a distinguishable conversion of U(IV) to U(V) (Figure 2) as indicated in the CV scans in Figure 1.
By combining electrochemical studies with XPS analysis of Dy-UO2, a possible anodic oxidation mechanism in the potential range -1.2 V to -0.4 V is proposed. First, carbonate adsorbs on the UO2 surface to form (U(IV)O2)(CO3)y-2y, which is not quite stable, since the surface interaction involves only physisorption. This physisorbed intermediate (U(IV)O2)(CO3)y-2y is stabilized by oxidation to (U(V)O2)(CO3)y1-2y, a process that would also require the simultaneous incorporation of an O interstitial (OI) into the surface of the oxide.
Figure 3. The U 4f7/2 XPS peak resolved into contributions from U(IV), U(V) and U(VI)  for surfaces anodically oxidized at -900, -750, -400, and 350 mV for 1 h in 0.1 M NaCl containing 0.05 M carbonate.
Figure 3. The U 4f7/2 XPS peak resolved into contributions from U(IV), U(V) and U(VI) for surfaces anodically oxidized at -900, -750, -400, and 350 mV for 1 h in 0.1 M NaCl containing 0.05 M carbonate.

By Nazhen Liu, Department of Chemistry, Western University

Contact Info


 Surface Science Western
       999 Collip Circle (LL31)
       London, Ontario, N6G 0J3
       Canada

 sswinfo@uwo.ca
  +1 (519) 661-2173

FOLLOW US